Abstract 6046 summarized the results of a phase II study for locally advanced nasopharynx cancer, in which patients received induction TPF (two to four cycles) followed by definitive RT + cisplatin. Among 45 patients, 60% had stage IV disease. IMRT was given for 76% of patients. Objective response rate after TPF was 87%, and 2 year OS was 85%. Although most NPC trials have administered adjuvant PF after chemoradiation, perhaps the order should be reversed. This question merits further study.
Abstract 6042 was a retrospective comparison of RT + cisplatin versus RT + cetuximab as definitive treatment of locally or regionally advanced HNSCC at a single institution. Among 175 patients, approximately 2/3 of patients were treated with cisplatin + RT. Compared to the patients treated with cetuximab + RT, patients treated with cisplatin + RT had better KPS and better outcomes for all efficacy endpoints. In contrast, at the oral session on Saturday, Abstract 6010 showed no difference in the primary endpoint of the study (larynx preservation) among 153 patients with stage III/IV SCC of larynx/hypopharynx randomized to RT + cisplatin versus RT + cetuximab. However, all patients in Abstract 6010 received induction TPF prior to randomization. With recognition of the potential for cumulative toxicity with platinum, the use of induction TPF prior to randomization may have had a detrimental effect on platinum tolerability in Abstract 6010. As such, we still do not have the definitive answer to the question of the relative efficacy of these two drugs in the combined modality setting.

Posted by Matthew G. Fury, MD, PhD 
